OpenSocietyNetwork images

Discover Best OpenSocietyNetwork Images of World

#food #travel #sports #news #may #thursday

🚀 Apply to Join the Open Society University Network Academy Fellowships 2024-25 at Chatham House! 🌍 Get ready to develop your research and leadership skills at a premier policy institute, merging training, mentorship, and your personal research project. 🔍 Benefits: Monthly stipend of £2,365 for London living costs Coverage for relocation, immigration healthcare, and research expenses Access to workshops, media training, career coaching, and networking opportunities Chatham House membership upon fellowship completion 💼 Remote and Pay: Location: Hybrid (Office/Home), minimum 2 days in the office per week Contract: 4 months 📅 Deadline: Apply by15 May 2024. 📝 Apply NOW: https://shorturl.at/wIOY3 🏷️ #Leadership #Research #Fellowship #Policy #ChathamHouse #OpenSociety #AcademyFellowships #RemoteWork #LeadershipDevelopment #ResearchSkills #FellowshipOpportunity #PolicyInstitute #ChathamHouseAcademy #OpenSocietyNetwork #RemoteWorkOpportunity #GlobalAffairs #InternationalRelations #ApplyNow #CareerDevelopment #Networking #ProfessionalGrowth #LondonLiving #GlobalLeadership #FutureLeaders #HybridWork

View

5/13/2024, 12:40:07 PM

View

5/11/2024, 12:39:07 AM

View

5/5/2024, 12:38:10 PM

View

5/4/2024, 12:39:10 PM

View

5/2/2024, 12:37:09 AM

View

5/1/2024, 12:37:12 AM

View

4/29/2024, 12:13:24 AM

Reposted from @mizibak_shadow_banned_again When we looked more closely at the background of the judges of the #EuropeanCourtofHumanRights , we never imagined the troubling discoveries we would make. After a 6 month investigation, we are releasing an important report outlining the extent of the relationship between #NGOs and #ECHR judges, and the resulting problems and conflicts of interest. We have identified seven NGOs that are both active at the #Court , and have judges among their former staff. At least 22 of the 100 judges who have served since 2009 are former staff or leaders of these seven NGOs. Among these, the #OpenSocietyNetwork stands out for the number of judges linked to it (12) and for the fact that it actually funds the other six organisations identified in this report. The powerful presence of the £OpenSociety and its affiliates is problematic in many ways. But even more serious is the fact that 18 of the 22 judges were found to have served on cases initiated or supported by the organization with which they were previously associated. We have identified 88 problematic cases over the last 10 years. In only 12 cases have judges abstained from sitting because of their connection with an NGO involved. And this is a low assessment that does not even take into account the close financial links between NGOs. For example, we did not identify all cases involving other NGOs funded by the #OpenSocietyFoundation , nor did we identify all cases in which a judge from an NGO funded by #OSF ruled in cases in which that foundation acted. This situation is serious, and calls into question the independence of the Court and the impartiality of the judges. These conflicts must be remedied immediately. Our report makes proposals to that end. In particular, greater attention should be paid to the choice of candidates for the post of judge by avoiding the appointment of activists and campaigners. The report also makes proposals to ensure transparency of interests and links between applicants, judges and NGOs, and to formalise the procedures for #deportation and disqualification. Read the full report of the ECLJ: NGOs and Judges of the ECHR:- https://eclj.org/ngo

View

2/27/2020, 8:01:12 AM

When we looked more closely at the background of the judges of the #EuropeanCourtofHumanRights , we never imagined the troubling discoveries we would make. After a 6 month investigation, we are releasing an important report outlining the extent of the relationship between #NGOs and #ECHR judges, and the resulting problems and conflicts of interest. We have identified seven NGOs that are both active at the #Court , and have judges among their former staff. At least 22 of the 100 judges who have served since 2009 are former staff or leaders of these seven NGOs. Among these, the #OpenSocietyNetwork stands out for the number of judges linked to it (12) and for the fact that it actually funds the other six organisations identified in this report. The powerful presence of the #OpenSociety and its affiliates is problematic in many ways. But even more serious is the fact that 18 of the 22 judges were found to have served on cases initiated or supported by the organization with which they were previously associated. We have identified 88 problematic cases over the last 10 years. In only 12 cases have judges abstained from sitting because of their connection with an NGO involved. And this is a low assessment that does not even take into account the close financial links between NGOs. For example, we did not identify all cases involving other NGOs funded by the #OpenSocietyFoundation , nor did we identify all cases in which a judge from an NGO funded by #OSF ruled in cases in which that foundation acted. This situation is serious, and calls into question the independence of the Court and the impartiality of the judges. These conflicts must be remedied immediately. Our report makes proposals to that end. In particular, greater attention should be paid to the choice of candidates for the post of judge by avoiding the appointment of activists and campaigners. The report also makes proposals to ensure transparency of interests and links between applicants, judges and NGOs, and to formalise the procedures for #deportation and disqualification. Read the full report of the ECLJ: NGOs and Judges of the ECHR:- https://eclj.org/ngos-and-the-judges-of-the-echr?lng=en

View

2/26/2020, 11:37:45 PM